Machiavelli wrote a very interesting piece of literature
called “The Prince.” In it he outlines what would make a successful ruler. Specifically,
how power is gained and how it can be maintained. Similarly, our scriptures
outline how priesthood power is gained and maintained in Doctrine and Covenants
section 121. In this post I will be comparing both pieces of literature and analyzing
what is meant by virtue in each of these contexts.
First, how is power
gained? Doctrine and Covenants 121:37 states, “That they may be conferred
upon us, it is true.” Or in other words, the priesthood power of God is a gift
that is conferred upon man. However, although the priesthood power is simply given
it is given conditionally upon righteous behavior. Therefore, the power “cannot
be controlled nor handled only upon the principles of righteousness” (vs. 36).
Machiavelli says power is gained in 3 ways. By skill (or virtue),
by luck, and by crime. He gives the examples of Moses, Cyrus and Romulus who by
their skill became rulers and thereby gained power. Later he says, “A prince
must lay strong foundations, otherwise he is bound to come to grief” (page 34).
He also believed power could be gained by luck giving the examplse of Sforza
and Borgia. And lastly, he explained how power often is gained by crime, which
is in direct conflict with what Doctrine and Covenants teaches us. Machiavelli
also shared that power could be gained by “winning over to your cause some
baron of the kingdom” (page 13) or by intensely studying the subject of war
(40). Nowhere does he mention power being conferred upon a man as a divine
gift, which is what the Doctrine and Covenants teaches us.
Secondly, how is
power maintained? According to the Doctrine and Covenants, once priesthood
power is conferred upon a man it is maintained by righteousness. If a man does
not act righteously “the Spirit of the Lord is grieved; and when it is
withdrawn, Amen to the priesthood or the authority of that man” (vs 37). Priesthood
power is maintained by obedience, humility, and charity. The promise to those
who maintain this power through righteousness is seen in verse 46 which says, “The
Holy Ghost shall be thy constant companion, and thy scepter an unchanging
scepter of righteousness and truth; and thy dominion shall be an everlasting
dominion, and without compulsory means it shall flow unto thee forever and
ever.”
Machiavelli’s ideas on how power is maintained both compare
and contrast to what is seen in Doctrine and Covenants. For one, he tells the
prince that men “who become princes through their own strength of character…find
it easy to hold onto” (page 17). This is similar to the doctrine in Doctrine
and Covenants because they both teach that men with strength of character will
be able to “hold onto” their power. Also, Machiavelli states that it is more
effective to maintain power by being cruel than by being kind. In a way this
compares Doctrine and Covenants because it says, “Reproving betimes with
sharpness, when moved upon by the Holy Ghost; and then showing forth afterwards
an increase of love toward him whom thou hast reproved” (vs 43). Or in other
words, sometimes you have to be sharp in order to maintain unity and order.
In contrast with the Doctrine and Covenants Machiavelli teaches
that dishonesty helps to maintain power. He says, “In the end, they [who
manipulated] won out over those who tried to act honestly” (page 47). But we as
Latter-day Saints know that true power is only gained and maintained by
righteousness.
Lastly, what is meant
by virtue in each of these contexts? In the Doctrine and Covenants we read,
“…and let virtue garnish thy thoughts unceasingly.” From this we know that
virtue is something which can garnish, or embellish, our thoughts. It
encompasses goodness. In “The Prince” the word virtú derived from Latin is used
several times. It means “virtue,” but in a little bit of a different sense than
is used in the Doctrine and Covenants. Machiavelli uses it to describe the attributes
of man. Some of the English translations of virtú come out to be “one’s own
arms and energy”, his merit, his own talent, his strength, or his skill.
According to Machiavelli virtue describes the essence of being a man.
Virtue and power therefore have a different relationship in the
Doctrine and Covenants than they do in The Prince. In the Doctrine and
Covenants, by being virtuous, or good, you obtain power. In The Prince, virtue,
or your own strength and ability, is your power.
Overall, although Machiavelli makes some good points, as
members of the church we know that God’s formula for gaining and maintaining
power is always the correct one.
I found it was very interesting how you related how power is gained. It is very interesting to see how to receive power according to man and then according to God. I felt you really dove deep into the text and expounded beautifully. I also loved you closing statement, it just capped the whole blog, "we know that God's formula for gaining and maintaining power is always the correct one." I couldn't agree more with you, that it by God's formula we can have His power here on earth.
ReplyDeleteWhen I thought about the comparisons between the tow works, I automatically thought about people who are already in power. I like liked how you pointed out the similarities and differences in coming to power as well as maintaining it. Knowing where the power comes from makes a big difference on what we do to keep it. I thought your post was an insightful one overall--it showed the different meanings of "virtue" while still showing that both authors value virtue for power.
ReplyDeleteI really liked how you guided the post with bolded questions, it made the post easy to follow and I knew what to expect in each section. Great quotes and summary from The Prince! Your contrast between The Prince and Doctrine and Covenants is right on point. I really liked your contrast on Machiavelli's ideas on cruelty vs the scripture on correcting with sharpness.
ReplyDelete